Saul Steinberg, Autogeography, 1966 |
I’m in the
beginning stages of starting a new novel and am at once excited and frankly,
terrified. Excited by the potential for discovery. And terrified by the
possibility of failure that I know, from experience, leads to feeling hopelessly
lost. Wandering in the wilderness.
I wish I had
a map.
As a plot
challenged writer, I have been trying to force myself to think ahead, to plan,
and to outline. But making an outline before you write a draft is like making a
map of a place you’ve never been. I’m back to thinking that the first draft has to be an expedition, a
voyage into unknown territory. Figuring out the paths and sights, the flora,
fauna, the people you think you might meet before you get there just doesn’t
make sense. It would be like a cartographer making a map of a place he’s never
been before he sets out to explore.
In his
astonishingly wise book, Maps of The Imagination: The Writer As Cartographer,
Peter Turchi says, “If we attempt to map the world of a story before we explore
it we are likely either to (a) prematurely limit our exploration, so as to
reduce the amount of material we need to consider, or (b) explore at length
but, recognizing the impossibility of taking note of everything, and having no
sound basis for choosing what to include, arbitrarily omit entire realms of
information.”
19th Century map of a woman's heart. |
It is
tempting for many writers (myself included) to stay close to a known path by
repeating what we know, doing what we feel comfortable and competent doing.
Imitating what has worked in the past is often (although not always) a safe
bet. But if we give in to that safe route, we are depriving ourselves of
discovering anything new. Of growing both as writers and as human beings.
We do look to
other writers and other pieces of successful writing for clues, travel tips,
you could call them. But again, if we give in to following a map someone else
has made, we will not discover much that is new.
Edinburg Scotland Map 1947 Artist: Kerry Lee |
If I want to
continue on with the travel analogy, comparing the voyage into a new story with
taking a trip, then I guess we could consider the different ways to travel, the
benefits and the drawbacks. Going someplace foreign on a guided tour has its
merits, although you’re unlikely to discover much that hasn’t already been well
documented. Going on your own with a map someone else has made is a bit more
adventuresome and you might wander off road now and then, meet some interesting
people, see things that you personally haven’t seen before but others probably
have. (If there’s a map, you can bet that others have traveled the road before
you)
Map by Julia McKenzie Art |
But if you
strike out into the wild, into uncharted territory, you will have to be your
own guide, follow your instincts. You might get eaten by a monster. Or perhaps you’ll
find treasure. Even if someone has gone down the same path before you, you will
see it through your own eyes without already expecting what might be there. Once
you’ve gone out and come back, (if you do come back…) THEN you can make a map.
In the words
of Voltaire, “Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position. But certainty is an
absurd one.”
What about
you? Are you a mapper? Or an explorer?
Take Good
Care,
Sharry
I love this Voltaire quote. I vote for uncomfortable!
ReplyDeleteI'm mucking about on my own path right now so this is perfect. Wishing I had a brighter flashlight!
ReplyDelete